Would Cleveland be willing to give the #2 pick in the draft to secure their QB of the present and future? Shouldn't the #8 pick in the 2012 draft, a franchise QB, a two time 4,000 yard passer be polished enough to garner the second pick in a QB starved draft? If so, should we be interested?
Here's my thinking. Gase is in for the long haul. He signed a five year deal. That's the kind of deal you give a QB guru when you plan on drafting a QB. That's the kind of time it takes for the two to grow together. Second, even most Tannehill supporters agree that you can win with Tannehill but Tannehill isn't going to win you games. The same supporters are adamant about the fact that this team's biggest offensive weakness is at OL. So let's take the #2 pick and draft LT Joe Stanley. Then draft one of the big three QBs at #8. We didn't plan on having a QB to win us games anyway. The money we save playing a rookie offsets the dead money for RT and the deal gets sweeter each year afterward. Acquiring that pick nets us a premiere LT next to B Albert and Mike Pouncey. We sign the best RG available in free agency and all the excuses dry up. That line will allow us to run on anyone and allow us to properly groom a true franchise Quarterback; one without a ton of bad habits. Love 17 or hate him, this team isn't going anywhere anytime soon and this idea isn't about my feelings towards Ryan. I think it is strategically the right move that will pay big dividends down the line. I also think it would be more fair to judge Gase on how he develops a rookie behind a kick ass offensive line than how he resurrects the career of RT behind continued patchwork up front.
If you don't think Cleveland would give the #2 pick in this year's draft for him, I think it's fair to say RT hasn't come that far in his four years and isn't worthy of being called "A Baird Man".
Here's my thinking. Gase is in for the long haul. He signed a five year deal. That's the kind of deal you give a QB guru when you plan on drafting a QB. That's the kind of time it takes for the two to grow together. Second, even most Tannehill supporters agree that you can win with Tannehill but Tannehill isn't going to win you games. The same supporters are adamant about the fact that this team's biggest offensive weakness is at OL. So let's take the #2 pick and draft LT Joe Stanley. Then draft one of the big three QBs at #8. We didn't plan on having a QB to win us games anyway. The money we save playing a rookie offsets the dead money for RT and the deal gets sweeter each year afterward. Acquiring that pick nets us a premiere LT next to B Albert and Mike Pouncey. We sign the best RG available in free agency and all the excuses dry up. That line will allow us to run on anyone and allow us to properly groom a true franchise Quarterback; one without a ton of bad habits. Love 17 or hate him, this team isn't going anywhere anytime soon and this idea isn't about my feelings towards Ryan. I think it is strategically the right move that will pay big dividends down the line. I also think it would be more fair to judge Gase on how he develops a rookie behind a kick ass offensive line than how he resurrects the career of RT behind continued patchwork up front.
If you don't think Cleveland would give the #2 pick in this year's draft for him, I think it's fair to say RT hasn't come that far in his four years and isn't worthy of being called "A Baird Man".
Comment